logic of betrayal...

am who am
am what am
am the way am

the thing is,
you trust me
don't you?

and there is a thing
about the thing,
the thing
not about 'you trusting me'
but the thing
is about 'trust'

responsibility
some say
bondage
some say
relation
some say
binding
some say

i don't know
i say

logic says
when trust comes
into existence
the very moment,
the lack if it
and
also the break of it
come into existence...

but i believe,
mind you
believe is
higher level of
trust
(and that's where,
i enter the domain
of my specialisation
and speculation: 'irony')
that the relation
between you n i
is based on trust
and
the lack
and the break of it
as well

with it
come the rest
of the things

'the things'
you know?